In this year's final installment of our series on e-discovery basics, we delve into the world of privilege logs. Gone are the days when a lawyer would print out documents and prepare a privilege log by drafting individual descriptions—one privileged document at a time. Leveraging the latest technological tools, today's eData lawyers are as sophisticated and efficient in preparing privilege logs as they are in all other phases of discovery. Privilege-log planning should begin well before the first privileged document is logged. In fact, privilege-log strategy should be considered at the outset of a matter and included in early meet-and-confers with opposing counsel about the discovery process. In this article, we provide an overview of the different types of privilege logs; lay out best practices for negotiating ESI or privilege-log protocols; discuss what to do if an ESI or privilege-log protocol has not been entered in a matter; consider practical uses of technology to generate privilege logs; and address the inadvertent production of a privileged document.

Privilege Log Types

Not all privilege logs are identical; they can vary widely in detail, scope and burden. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not use the term "log" or otherwise spell out logging procedures. Instead, Rule 26(b)(5)(A)(ii) requires a withholding party to "describe the nature" of withheld documents "in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the claim." In the absence of clearly defined requirements, three types of privilege logs have emerged.